<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACOG revises labor induction guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prepforbirth.com/2009/07/21/acog-revises-labor-induction-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prepforbirth.com/2009/07/21/acog-revises-labor-induction-guidelines/</link>
	<description>Growing confident &#38; equipped families through childbirth education classes and labor doula services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:42:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://prepforbirth.com/2009/07/21/acog-revises-labor-induction-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prepforbirth.com/?p=309#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Show me the studies that do not associate adverse outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show me the studies that do not associate adverse outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Fogelson</title>
		<link>http://prepforbirth.com/2009/07/21/acog-revises-labor-induction-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Fogelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prepforbirth.com/?p=309#comment-89</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt; (I want to see these studies)
...(again studies please)

References are in the bibliography of the committee opinion, and the pertinent facts are summarized in the text of the opinion.  Your implication is somehow that they are not sourcing their work appropriately, when in fact they are sourcing it correctly.  

Miso has been demonstrated to shorten induction times and is not associated with adverse outcomes, which is why they list (and source that information) as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; (I want to see these studies)<br />
&#8230;(again studies please)</p>
<p>References are in the bibliography of the committee opinion, and the pertinent facts are summarized in the text of the opinion.  Your implication is somehow that they are not sourcing their work appropriately, when in fact they are sourcing it correctly.  </p>
<p>Miso has been demonstrated to shorten induction times and is not associated with adverse outcomes, which is why they list (and source that information) as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
